<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God&#039;s Integrity and the Age of the Earth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corbystephens.com/2007/08/26/gods-integrity-and-the-age-of-the-earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corbystephens.com/2007/08/26/gods-integrity-and-the-age-of-the-earth/</link>
	<description>Where Introvert Meets Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 04:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corby Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.corbystephens.com/2007/08/26/gods-integrity-and-the-age-of-the-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Corby Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corbystephens.com/?p=61#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Thanks MaryAnne! I&#039;m always encouraged (and a little surprised) to know that someone is reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks MaryAnne! I&#8217;m always encouraged (and a little surprised) to know that someone is reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryAnne Hommel</title>
		<link>http://www.corbystephens.com/2007/08/26/gods-integrity-and-the-age-of-the-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryAnne Hommel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corbystephens.com/?p=61#comment-27</guid>
		<description>&quot;These two opposing views call into question God&#039;s integrity. That is not a good thing.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Corby,&lt;br/&gt;This is a good point.  It reminds me of the Bible code frenzy some years back, in which the prevailing argument for the codes was based on this skeptical generations need for proof.  I always thought that was a lame argument, as if the Master Apologist, Jesus, was addressing imbeciles.  Your comments over on SMP are right on, I appreciate your convictions.  Your CCBC students are sure to be blessed as they study Genesis with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These two opposing views call into question God&#8217;s integrity. That is not a good thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Corby,<br />This is a good point.  It reminds me of the Bible code frenzy some years back, in which the prevailing argument for the codes was based on this skeptical generations need for proof.  I always thought that was a lame argument, as if the Master Apologist, Jesus, was addressing imbeciles.  Your comments over on SMP are right on, I appreciate your convictions.  Your CCBC students are sure to be blessed as they study Genesis with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

